Tag: 2024 election

  • Harris and Walz Unveil Bold Rural Plan to Chip Away at Trump’s Stronghold in 2024 Election

    Harris and Walz Unveil Plan to Win Over Rural Voters, Target Trump’s Stronghold

    In a bid to cut into former President Donald Trump’s rural voter base, Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz have unveiled a comprehensive plan to address key issues affecting rural communities. The Harris-Walz plan, which will focus on healthcare, economic development, and agricultural reforms, aims to chip away at Trump’s nearly two-to-one advantage among rural voters, according to AP VoteCast data from 2020.

    Healthcare Access and Workforce Expansion in Rural Areas

    A central pillar of the Harris-Walz proposal is improving rural healthcare. The plan outlines the recruitment of 10,000 new healthcare professionals for rural and tribal areas through scholarships, loan forgiveness, and grants. It also calls for Congress to permanently extend telemedicine coverage under Medicare, a lifeline for millions during the pandemic that is set to expire at the end of 2024.

    Additionally, the proposal includes new funding for volunteer EMS services to reduce the number of Americans living more than 25 minutes away from emergency medical care.

    Economic Support for Farmers and Rural Communities

    The Harris-Walz campaign promises targeted economic relief by advocating for the restoration of the Affordable Connectivity Program, which provided subsidies for home internet but expired in June 2024. Their proposal also urges Congress to require manufacturers to grant farmers the right to repair their equipment, a significant issue for agricultural workers.

    Walz to Promote the Plan in Key Battleground States

    Governor Walz will officially unveil the plan on Tuesday during a campaign stop in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, a critical battleground for the 2024 election. As part of the outreach strategy, Walz will feature in a new radio ad, sharing his small-town upbringing and football coaching experience to connect with rural voters.

    “In a small town, you don’t focus on politics—you take care of your neighbors and mind your own business,” Walz says in the ad, which criticizes Trump and his running mate, Senator JD Vance, for being self-interested. The ad will air across more than 500 rural radio stations in key swing states, including Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

    A Strategic Push to Win Over Swing Voters

    With just three weeks until Election Day, the Harris-Walz ticket is making a concerted effort to sway rural voters, who traditionally lean Republican. Democrats hope that appealing to economic concerns and healthcare access will help them chip away at Trump’s edge in rural regions. Both parties are working to expand their influence beyond their usual voter bases, knowing that even a small shift in voter behavior could determine the outcome in critical swing states.

    Source : Swifteradio.com

  • Immigration, Taxes, and Project 2025: Key Claims from the 2024 VP Debate Fact-Checked

    Immigration, Taxes, and Project 2025: Key Claims from the 2024 VP Debate Fact-Checked

    In the highly anticipated vice-presidential debate for the 2024 U.S. election, candidates Tim Walz and JD Vance clashed on a range of critical issues including immigration, foreign policy, and reproductive rights. This debate marked the only opportunity for the candidates to showcase their positions ahead of the election.

    Key Claims Fact-Checked by BBC Verify:

    1. The Number of Illegal Immigrants in the U.S.

    CLAIM: Vance stated, “We’ve got 20-25 million illegal aliens who are here in the country.”

    VERDICT: This assertion is misleading. Estimates from various reputable sources place the number of undocumented immigrants at approximately 11-12 million. The Office of Homeland Security reported around 11 million as of January 2022, with similar figures provided by the Pew Research Center and the Migration Policy Institute. Vance’s numbers are significantly inflated compared to these estimates.

    2. Project 2025 and a Pregnancy Registry

    CLAIM: Walz claimed, “Their Project 2025 is going to have a registry of pregnancies.”

    VERDICT: This statement is inaccurate. Project 2025, associated with the Heritage Foundation, does not propose a registry of pregnancies. While it discusses the collection of data regarding abortions, there is no indication of establishing a federal agency for pregnancy registration. Former President Trump has distanced himself from this initiative.

    3. Unfrozen Assets to Iran Under the Biden Administration

    CLAIM: Vance alleged, “Iran has received over $100 billion in unfrozen assets by the Harris administration.”

    VERDICT: This claim is false. There is no evidence to support that over $100 billion in assets were unfrozen by the current administration. The funds referenced include approximately $16 billion released under two agreements during the Biden presidency, which were tied to humanitarian purposes and did not involve the amount stated by Vance.

    4. Trump’s Federal Tax Payments

    CLAIM: Walz asserted, “Donald Trump hasn’t paid any federal tax in the last 15 years.” He later specified, “in the last year as president.”

    VERDICT: The first part of Walz’s claim is false, while the second part is true. Trump has paid federal taxes over the last 15 years; however, according to a 2022 report, he did not pay any federal income tax in his final year as president, 2020. The House Ways and Means Committee disclosed Trump’s tax returns for 2015-2020, revealing a varied tax payment history during that period.

    Conclusion: A Debate Full of Claims and Counterclaims

    The debate highlighted significant issues affecting the American public, with candidates presenting contrasting views. Fact-checking these claims is essential to ensure voters are informed ahead of the upcoming election.

    Stay tuned for further updates and analysis as we continue to cover the 2024 election landscape.

    Source: BBC

  • Trump Claims Harris Requested Another Debate, Reiterates Refusal to Participate

    Trump Claims Harris Requested Another Debate, Reiterates Refusal to Participate

    Former President Donald Trump took to his Truth Social platform late Tuesday night, following the vice-presidential debate, to assert that Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign requested a second debate—a request he quickly rejected once again.

    Key Details:

    • Trump alleged that Harris had “just put out a request for another debate” and suggested that the Democrats are pushing for a rematch because Governor Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, “lost so badly tonight.”
    • Despite the alleged request, Trump remained firm in his decision not to participate in another debate, claiming he already defeated both Harris and President Joe Biden in this election cycle’s debates.
    • Trump further argued that it is “too late” for another debate as early voting has already begun, referencing the fact that the last 2020 presidential debate occurred in late October.
    • The Harris campaign has not yet responded to Trump’s claims.

    Betting Odds for Another Debate:

    • The chances of another debate between Trump and Harris currently stand at 20% on the crypto-based betting platform Polymarket. While odds briefly rose to 34% before Tuesday’s vice-presidential debate, they have since dropped significantly.
    • Unlike the impact of the presidential debate last month, this latest face-off between VP candidates appears to have little influence on the broader betting odds for the election outcome.

    Poll Numbers:

    • Harris holds a slim 2.6-point lead in FiveThirtyEight’s national polls average. However, swing state polls remain highly competitive. Despite this, Trump claimed in his post that he was “leading BIG in the polls.”

    Background:

    • In September, Harris accepted a debate invitation from CNN for October 23. The proposed debate was set to follow the format of Biden and Trump’s first encounter, with Atlanta as the host city. Trump, however, dismissed the offer immediately, citing the proximity to early voting and reiterating his stance at a rally in North Carolina.

    Source: Forbes

  • U.S. Ports Face Historic Shutdown as Dockworkers Strike Indefinitely

    U.S. Ports Face Historic Shutdown as Dockworkers Strike Indefinitely

    In a significant turn of events, tens of thousands of dockworkers have initiated an indefinite strike at major ports across the United States, marking the first such shutdown in nearly 50 years. The strike, led by members of the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA), began on Tuesday and has effectively halted container traffic from Maine to Texas. With the presidential election and the busy holiday shopping season on the horizon, this strike poses a serious threat to trade and the overall economy.

    Reasons Behind the Strike

    The catalyst for the strike stems from stalled contract negotiations, as the current agreement between the ILA and shipping firms expired on Monday. The White House has confirmed that President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris are closely monitoring the situation. “The President has directed his team to convey his message directly to both sides that they need to be at the table and negotiating in good faith—fairly and quickly,” stated a White House representative.

    The ILA and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX) are at an impasse over a six-year master contract that affects approximately 25,000 port workers involved in container and roll-on/roll-off operations. USMX recently increased its wage offer, proposing nearly a 50% raise along with enhanced pension contributions and healthcare options. Meanwhile, ILA leadership is advocating for significant pay increases due to rising automation concerns and the financial impact of inflation on workers’ wages.

    Union leader Harold Daggett has voiced that workers deserve a pay hike, arguing that they are owed compensation as shipping profits soared during the pandemic. The ILA claims to represent over 85,000 workers, with about 47,000 active members currently reported.

    Potential Impact on Goods and Economy

    The ongoing strike is expected to have immediate repercussions on time-sensitive imports, such as food products. The ports involved handle approximately 14% of U.S. agricultural exports and more than half of imports, which include key items like bananas and chocolate. Additionally, industries such as tobacco, clothing, and automotive sectors could also experience significant disruptions.

    According to Seth Harris, a Northeastern University professor and former White House labor adviser, while immediate economic impacts may be minimal, prolonged strikes could lead to rising prices and shortages in the coming weeks. Grace Zemmer, an associate U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, estimates that the strike could cost the U.S. economy approximately $4.5 billion for each week it lasts, with over 100,000 workers potentially facing temporary layoffs.

    Political Ramifications Ahead of Elections

    The timing of this strike adds a layer of complexity to the upcoming U.S. general election, as President Biden faces scrutiny amid rising unemployment and economic uncertainty. Historically, U.S. presidents can intervene in labor disputes that threaten national security or safety, imposing an 80-day cooling-off period. However, the White House has indicated that no such action is currently planned.

    Calls for intervention have come from various quarters, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which emphasized the need for prompt action to prevent economic disruptions similar to those experienced during pandemic-era supply chain issues. Suzanne P. Clark, president and CEO of the Chamber, expressed concerns about allowing a contract dispute to adversely affect the economy.

    While Daggett endorsed Biden in 2020, his recent criticisms of the administration highlight the delicate balance Biden must strike. The potential fallout from this strike could sway public opinion against the ILA, despite the historical significance of labor movements in the U.S.

    As the situation develops, the resolution of this strike will not only impact dockworkers but could also reverberate through the broader economy and influence the political landscape as the election approaches.

    Source: BBC

  • Trump Targets Harris on Immigration Issues During Wisconsin Speech

    Trump Targets Harris on Immigration Issues During Wisconsin Speech

    In a fiery address on Saturday, former President Donald Trump unleashed a barrage of criticisms against Vice President Kamala Harris, linking her to illegal immigration and alleging her responsibility for crime associated with undocumented migrants. Speaking to a receptive crowd in Prairie du Chien, Trump asserted that he would “liberate Wisconsin from the mass migrant invasion,” emphasizing his intention to tackle immigration issues aggressively.

    This rally followed Harris’s recent comments on immigration during her visit to the U.S.-Mexico border, where she announced plans to further restrict asylum claims. Trump seized on this backdrop, claiming Harris had “erased our border” and labeling her policies as detrimental to national security. He emphasized that frustration over illegal immigration could swing votes in critical battleground states like Wisconsin, where he seeks to regain support.

    “We’re going to liberate the country,” he declared, as he painted a grim picture of immigration’s impact on public safety, alleging that migrants contribute to crime. This message resonates with many voters, as recent polls indicate that a majority believe Trump would handle immigration more effectively than Harris.

    Throughout his speech, Trump meandered through various topics, often losing coherence. He recounted personal experiences, including two assassination attempts and expressed dissatisfaction with the U.S. Secret Service for limiting his rally size. His comments spanned a range of issues from climate change to playful jabs about his physique compared to President Joe Biden’s, even pondering the origins of a fly buzzing near him.

    Trump repeatedly referenced Harris’s recent statements, criticizing her for calling him out on his immigration policies. “I had to sit there and listen to her lies,” he stated, as the crowd erupted in applause. He went on to label Harris as “mentally impaired” and a “disaster,” escalating his personal attacks against her.

    Harris, meanwhile, was actively campaigning in San Francisco, where she framed the election as a choice between “two very different visions for our nation.” She characterized Trump’s rhetoric as stale, stating, “Donald Trump is the same old tired show,” while cautioning that the implications of his potential return to the White House would be severe.

    At the Prairie du Chien event, Trump also showcased poster-sized mugshots of individuals in the U.S. illegally accused of crimes, including the recent case of Alejandro Jose Coronel Zarate, charged with serious offenses in Wisconsin. Local officials, including Police Chief Kyle Teynor, highlighted the incident to underscore concerns about crime linked to undocumented individuals, reiterating Republican claims that authorities are failing to protect citizens.

    Republican U.S. Representative Derrick Van Orden, who addressed the crowd, echoed Trump’s sentiments, asserting that only the former president has the strength and resolve to restore order amidst what he termed a growing crisis.

    As the 2024 election approaches, immigration remains a pivotal issue, with both parties aiming to sway voters in key states. Trump’s strategy appears to hinge on energizing his base around immigration enforcement, hoping to capitalize on widespread frustration over border security and crime.

    Source: AP

  • Mark Carney Joins Liberal Economic Task Force

    Mark Carney Joins Liberal Economic Task Force


     

    Topic: Mark Carney Joins Economic Task Force for Canadian Liberals

    Story Summary:

    Former Bank of Canada and Bank of England Governor Mark Carney has been appointed to lead a newly established economic task force for the Liberal Party. His appointment marks a significant step as the Liberals seek to strengthen their economic policies ahead of the upcoming federal election.

    Key Points:

    • Carney’s Role: Mark Carney, a renowned economist with extensive experience in central banking, is expected to spearhead the Liberal Party’s efforts to formulate economic strategies aimed at addressing inflation, housing affordability, and sustainable growth. His leadership in the task force will bring a global perspective to Canada’s economic challenges.
    • Economic Focus: The task force’s primary mandate will be to craft a comprehensive economic plan that resonates with Canadians struggling with rising living costs, mortgage pressures, and concerns about economic inequality. Carney’s expertise will likely focus on inflation control and balanced fiscal policies.
    • Liberal Strategy: Carney’s involvement with the Liberal Party could signal a broader economic pivot, with the party seeking to counter Conservative criticisms about the handling of the economy. The Liberals are looking to leverage Carney’s economic credibility to restore confidence in their leadership on financial issues.
    • Political Speculation: Carney’s appointment is fueling speculation about his potential future role in Canadian politics. Though he has yet to officially declare any intention to run for office, his prominent position within the Liberal Party may suggest a more active political role in the future.

    Source: CBC News

  • Kamala Harris’s Campaign: How Internet Memes Became a Serious Strategy

    Kamala Harris’s Campaign: How Internet Memes Became a Serious Strategy


     

    Topic: Kamala Harris’s Campaign and the Role of Internet Memes

    Story Summary:

    Kamala Harris’s campaign for the 2024 U.S. election is leveraging internet memes as a critical component of its social media strategy. While memes may seem lighthearted, they have become a powerful tool for engaging young voters and shaping political narratives in the digital age.

    Key Points:

    • Memes as a Campaign Tool: Kamala Harris’s campaign has recognized the significance of memes in modern political discourse. Memes serve as a quick and engaging way to communicate complex political ideas, often with humor or satire.
    • Targeting Younger Voters: By embracing memes, the campaign is particularly focused on reaching younger, internet-savvy voters. This demographic spends significant time on social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter, where memes are prevalent.
    • Shaping Public Perception: Memes offer the Harris campaign a way to control and shape public perception of the candidate. They allow the team to react quickly to political events, amplifying messages that can go viral and attract widespread attention.
    • Serious Business: While memes may be viewed as informal or playful, Harris’s team takes them seriously as a part of their media strategy. The campaign has recruited experts who understand meme culture to help create content that resonates with digital audiences.
    • Potential Risks: While memes can engage voters, there are risks involved in using them for political purposes. Missteps in tone or timing could lead to backlash, and the fast-moving nature of internet culture means memes can quickly be co-opted or distorted by opponents.

    Source: The Globe and Mail

  • Nancy Pelosi Discusses Political Violence, Offers Advice to Kamala Harris on Trump Challenge

    In a candid interview, former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi addressed the rising tide of political violence in America and shared insights for Vice President Kamala Harris as she navigates the turbulent political landscape, particularly in light of a potential challenge against Donald Trump in the upcoming election.

    Concerns Over Political Violence

    Nancy Pelosi expressed deep concern over the escalating political violence that has plagued the nation in recent years. She noted that the increased polarization and divisive rhetoric have contributed significantly to an environment where violence is becoming more frequent in political discourse. “We are witnessing a dangerous trend where political disagreements are being met with threats and, at times, acts of violence,” Pelosi remarked. “This is not just detrimental to democracy but is an affront to the principles our nation was founded upon.”

    Pelosi emphasized the need for leaders across the political spectrum to denounce violence unequivocally and promote dialogue over division. She called for bipartisan efforts to address the root causes of this violence and encouraged leaders to engage with their constituents in meaningful ways that promote understanding and unity.

    Advice for Kamala Harris

    Turning her attention to Vice President Kamala Harris, Pelosi offered words of wisdom as Harris prepares for what could be a contentious campaign against former President Donald Trump. Pelosi, a seasoned politician with decades of experience navigating the complexities of Washington, urged Harris to remain steadfast in her convictions and to focus on the issues that matter most to the American people.

    “Kamala Harris has the opportunity to be a transformative leader, and she must remain true to her vision for the country,” Pelosi advised. “In the face of adversity, it is essential to stay grounded in the values that guide your leadership and to communicate those values clearly to the electorate.”

    Pelosi also highlighted the importance of resilience and adaptability in the face of a dynamic political environment. She noted that the ability to respond effectively to challenges and to pivot when necessary is crucial for any political leader, especially when facing opponents known for their unconventional tactics.

    The Trump Factor

    Discussing the possibility of another Trump candidacy, Pelosi acknowledged the unique challenges that Trump poses as a political adversary. His ability to galvanize a dedicated base and dominate media narratives has made him a formidable figure in American politics. However, Pelosi stressed that focusing solely on Trump could be a strategic misstep for Democrats.

    “While Trump remains a significant presence, the focus should not be entirely on him but on the broader vision for America’s future,” Pelosi stated. “Voters are looking for solutions to the challenges they face daily, from economic security to healthcare and climate change. Addressing these issues with practical, forward-thinking policies is where the focus should lie.”

    Looking Ahead

    As the political landscape continues to evolve, Nancy Pelosi remains hopeful that leaders like Kamala Harris will rise to the occasion and meet the challenges head-on with courage and clarity. She believes that the strength of American democracy lies in its ability to adapt and grow stronger through adversity.

    In closing, Pelosi reiterated her commitment to fostering a political environment where dialogue prevails over division and where the ideals of democracy are upheld for future generations. Her message to the nation is one of resilience and optimism, urging all Americans to engage in the democratic process and work together towards a more united and prosperous future.

  • 2020 Election Interference: Trump Faces Revised Charges

    US prosecutors have issued reviewed charges against former President Donald Trump for his alleged efforts to interfere in the 2020 election after his loss to Joe Biden.

    The charges follow a US Supreme Court ruling last month that presidents have broad immunity from prosecution for official acts committed while in office.

    The revised indictment sets out the same four counts against Trump — which he denies — but now they relate to his status as a political candidate rather than a sitting president.

    The 2020 election interference case, and other criminal cases facing the Republican candidate, are not likely to come to court before the election on November 5 of this year

    In addition to denying the allegations of election meddling, Trump backed his claim — without evidence — that there was widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.

    The revised indictment, presented by the Special Counsel of the Department of Justice, Jack Smith, leaves in place the four crimes that Trump is charged with: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, attempted obstruction of an official process and conspiracy against rights.

    Donald Trump has already pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    The former president’s personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, referred the BBC to Donald Trump’s campaign team, which did not respond to a request for comment.

    Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social that the new indictment was “an effort to resurrect a ‘dead’ Witch Hunt” and “distract the American People” from the election.

    He asked for it to be ‘dismissed IMMEDIATELY.’

    A source close to Donald Trump’s legal team told CBS News that the new accusation did not come as a surprise.

    “This is what the government is supposed to do based on what the Supreme Court did,” the source said. “It doesn’t change our position that we believe Smith’s case is flawed and it should be dismissed.”

    The new charging document, which has been reduced from 45 to 36 pages, reworks the language of the charges and refines the way the former president allegedly committed these crimes to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.

    For example, the new indictment rejects the allegation that Trump tried to pressure Justice Department officials to work to overturn his defeat.

    The Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s instructions to justice officials were not illegal.

    The special counsel’s office explained its reasoning in a statement.

    The indictment was presented to a new grand jury that had not yet heard evidence in the case. A grand jury is set up by a prosecutor to determine if there is enough evidence to prosecute.

    The Justice Department declined further comments.

    What are the functions of a grand jury?

    The new charging document argues that Trump acted as a private citizen — not as president — when he undertook the alleged scheme to influence the election.

    “The defendant had no official responsibility in relation to the certification procedure, but had a personal interest as a candidate to be declared the winner of the elections,” a new line in the document stated.

    Another new line refers to a lawsuit filed by his campaign in Georgia. In the old text, it was said that the complaint was “presented in his name”, but the new charge specifies that “it was raised in the capacity of the presidential candidate”.

    The new indictment also appears to have dropped charges against Jeffrey Clark — a former Justice Department official who played a key role in the so-called voter fraud scheme, according to prosecutors.

    The voter fraud scheme was an attempt to interfere with the Electoral College system that decides the presidential election.

    That included persuading Republican-controlled legislatures in seven states to choose Republican electors or no electors in states won by Biden.

    The forged certificates were later transferred to the US Senate in an attempt to count their votes instead of the real voters and nullify Biden’s victory.

    Clark was not named in any indictment, but was identified to the media through public records.

    The new indictment leaves open several key allegations against Trump, including that he tried to convince Vice President Mike Pence to block the certification of Biden’s election.

    In last month’s Supreme Court ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that any conversation between Trump and Pence likely falls into the category of official acts.

    “Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution,” he wrote, adding that it remains to be seen whether the government can rebut “that presumption of immunity”.

    The new indictment shows that Smith interpreted the Supreme Court’s decision to mean that his case could still move forward, said Daniel Charles Richman, a constitutional law expert at Columbia Law School.

    But it is not clear whether it could satisfy the Supreme Court’s framework for presidential immunity, said the law professor, because “the Court was painfully vague as to what private conduct done by a president can be charged criminally”.

    The new charge will not necessarily speed up the case either, Richman told the BBC.

    He doubts that it will be heard before the election.

    The CBS News source close to Trump’s legal team said the former president’s lawyers would ask for more time to prepare for the case.

    They said it would likely delay the start of the trial if the judge agrees.

    The case began after Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022 to oversee two federal investigations into Trump: the election fraud case and another case that accused the former president of taking classified documents to his Florida home after leaving office.

    On Monday, Smith’s team appealed a Florida judge’s decision to throw out the confidential documents case.

    “The district court deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent, misconstrued the statutes that authorized the special counsel’s appointment, and took inadequate account of the longstanding history of Attorney General appointments of special counsels,” the special counsel’s team wrote in their appeal.

    Both cases face an unsure future after the Supreme Court’s decision last month.

    If Trump defeats Democrat Kamala Harris, he will likely order the Justice Department to drop all federal charges against him.

     

    Source: BBC News

  • Trump’s Tariff Threats Challenge Harris’s Economic Plans

    Trump’s Tariff Threats Challenge Harris’s Economic Plans


    Overview:

    Event: Former President Donald Trump threatens new tariffs, complicating Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic agenda.

    Key Points:

    • Trump’s Tariff Proposal: Former President Donald Trump has announced plans to impose new tariffs if he returns to office, targeting various countries to protect U.S. industries. His proposal is seen as a potential disruption to current trade agreements and economic policies.
    • Impact on Harris’s Agenda: Vice President Kamala Harris, who is leading several key economic initiatives, faces challenges in balancing these proposals with her own economic strategies. The tariffs could potentially undermine her efforts to promote trade partnerships and economic stability.
    • Political Implications: The tariff threat adds tension to the political landscape, as Harris and other Democrats may need to reassess their economic policies in response to Trump’s aggressive trade stance. This move is expected to be a significant issue in the upcoming elections.
    • Public and International Reactions: The proposed tariffs have sparked debates among economists, politicians, and international leaders. Critics argue that the tariffs could lead to trade wars and economic instability, while supporters believe they could protect American jobs and industries.

    SOURCE: THE NEW YORK TIMES