The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, has commented on the recent developments in diplomatic engagement between the United States and Iran, calling the ongoing talks a “good sign,” while cautioning that it is still too early to determine whether they will yield concrete results.
Speaking at a press briefing following a series of international meetings, Grossi, who leads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), welcomed the renewed dialogue between Tehran and Washington after months of stalled negotiations. However, he emphasized that the talks remain fragile and the “jury is still out” on whether both sides will reach a substantive agreement regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
“The fact that there are discussions is, in itself, a positive indicator,” Grossi said. “But we have seen moments of dialogue before, and what matters is the outcome—whether it leads to greater transparency, compliance, and de-escalation.”
The talks come amid growing international concern over Iran’s expanding nuclear activities. According to IAEA reports, Iran has continued to enrich uranium at levels far beyond the limits set by the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which the U.S. exited in 2018 under the Trump administration. Since then, diplomatic efforts to revive the deal have been sporadic and unsuccessful.
U.S. and European officials have expressed hope that the current negotiations could lead to a de-escalation of tensions in the region, especially as Iran has signaled willingness to engage with international mediators. Still, concrete steps—such as limiting uranium enrichment and restoring full IAEA access to nuclear sites—remain uncertain.
Grossi noted that the IAEA is closely monitoring developments and is prepared to play a pivotal role in verifying any agreements reached. He also stressed the importance of transparency and trust in ensuring long-term nuclear non-proliferation.
“The IAEA’s role is not political, but technical,” he added. “But technical progress is only possible if the political will exists.”
Analysts suggest that the outcome of these talks could influence broader geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, including U.S. relations with regional allies and Iran’s standing on the international stage. With both countries navigating internal political pressures, any final agreement would likely require careful negotiation and compromise.
As diplomatic efforts continue, observers are urging both sides to prioritize peace, stability, and non-proliferation, while maintaining open lines of communication through trusted international institutions like the IAEA.
Swifteradio.com
