RFK Jr. Vows to Urge CDC to Halt Fluoride Recommendations in U.S. Drinking Water
Independent U.S. presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has announced that if elected, he will formally urge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to stop recommending the addition of fluoride to public drinking water. The controversial statement, made during a campaign appearance, marks a direct challenge to decades of public health policy in the United States.
Kennedy, a longtime critic of certain government health practices, said he believes the practice of fluoridation poses potential health risks and should no longer be endorsed by federal agencies. “When I’m in the White House, I will tell the CDC to end its recommendation that we put fluoride in our water,” Kennedy said. “This is an outdated and unsafe policy that the American people never consented to.”
Fluoridation of public water systems has been a standard health measure in the U.S. since the 1940s, aimed at reducing tooth decay and promoting oral health. The CDC, along with major health organizations such as the American Dental Association and the World Health Organization, has consistently supported the practice as safe and effective.
However, Kennedy argues that new scientific research raises concerns about fluoride’s potential link to neurological issues, particularly in children. He pointed to recent studies suggesting possible developmental effects from prolonged exposure to fluoride, though these claims remain heavily debated among experts.
Public health officials have responded to Kennedy’s comments with concern, warning that halting fluoride recommendations could reverse decades of dental health progress. “Fluoridation is one of the most cost-effective and beneficial public health interventions,” said a spokesperson for the CDC. “Removing it from our water systems would have serious consequences, particularly for low-income communities.”
Kennedy’s position on fluoride aligns with his broader platform, which includes skepticism of certain government health policies and a call for increased transparency and individual choice. While his stance resonates with some voters who support health freedom and limited government intervention, it has also sparked criticism from scientists and medical professionals who view it as anti-science.
As the 2024 election cycle heats up, Kennedy continues to distinguish himself from both major party candidates by challenging long-held public health norms. His campaign has drawn support from voters dissatisfied with the political establishment, but also scrutiny for promoting views that many experts deem controversial or unsupported by mainstream science.
With fluoride policy now in the spotlight, the debate over public health, personal choice, and scientific authority is likely to intensify in the months ahead.
Source : Swifteradio.com
