Home Tech Canadian Universities Rethink Exams Amid AI Cheating Surge

Canadian Universities Rethink Exams Amid AI Cheating Surge

by Adetoun Tade
0 comments
Menopause Care and Reproductive Health Banner
Canadian Universities Rethink Exams Amid AI Cheating Surge

Canadian post-secondary institutions are revamping how they assess students in response to the growing presence of generative AI like ChatGPT and fears of widespread academic dishonesty. Following a global trend, many Canadian universities are reverting to handwritten exams, exploring oral assessments, or integrating AI into coursework while ensuring transparency and academic integrity.

A 2024 KPMG study found that 60% of Canadian students use generative AI in their schoolwork. Some, like Karsten Mundel at the University of Alberta, see this as an opportunity to redefine learning outcomes and reframe AI as a collaborative tool rather than just a cheating aid. His institution has noted a rise in pen-and-paper tests, although he admits this comes with challenges, including students’ lack of experience with handwriting.

Student leaders like Katie Tamsett of the U of A and Melani Vevecka of the University of Toronto echo concerns about reverting to traditional exams. They advocate for clarity and education over punitive restrictions, warning that handwritten formats may disadvantage students with learning challenges. Vevecka warns of overreaction, emphasizing that AI can also be used productively — such as for generating practice questions.

At the British Columbia Institute of Technology, administrator Jennifer Figner calls the move back to in-person exams a “fear-based” approach. She urges universities to confront the reality of AI by designing assessments that incorporate its use, rather than attempting to eliminate it. She also cautions against overreliance on imperfect AI-detection software.

Meanwhile, at the University of British Columbia, Christina Hendricks says institutions are facing existential questions about what they’re teaching and how. Faculty are rethinking assessment formats — from monitored in-lab computer tests to multimedia projects — though all are vulnerable to AI manipulation. Hendricks believes the sector must ultimately overhaul its philosophy of assessment to prepare students for an AI-integrated world.

Swifteradio.com

You may also like

Leave a Comment