Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger Under Scrutiny Over Xinjiang Supply Chain Ties
Global fashion brands Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger are facing renewed criticism for their alleged connections to the Xinjiang region of China, where reports of forced labor and human rights abuses against the Uyghur Muslim population have drawn international condemnation. Both brands, owned by PVH Corp, have come under fire as advocacy groups and governments increase scrutiny over supply chains linked to the controversial region.
Allegations and Global Backlash
The fashion industry has faced mounting pressure to address forced labor concerns in Xinjiang, a major producer of cotton. Reports indicate that garments made with Xinjiang cotton could involve the forced labor of Uyghur minorities, prompting some brands to reassess their supply chains. However, Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, while acknowledging concerns, have struggled to eliminate ties to the region completely.
Brand Responses and Future Actions
In response, PVH Corp. has pledged to cut ties with any suppliers linked to forced labor, and has made public commitments to transparency. Despite these efforts, advocacy groups argue that more needs to be done to ensure accountability and ethical sourcing, as continued business with Xinjiang-linked suppliers risks further association with human rights violations.
Wider Implications for Fashion and Retail
This controversy not only impacts Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger but also reflects a broader challenge faced by the global fashion industry in ensuring ethical supply chains. The issue has raised questions about the role of corporate responsibility and the ability of multinational companies to operate ethically in regions with widespread human rights concerns.
Source:
The New York Times.
