Biden Administration’s Middle East Policy Under Scrutiny Amid Ongoing Conflict
In February, while enjoying an ice cream cone, President Joe Biden proclaimed that a ceasefire in Gaza was “close” and might materialize within days. However, more than seven months later, not only has Israel’s war on Gaza persisted, but it has also escalated, with Israeli troops launching invasions and airstrikes in Lebanon, leading to rising tensions and violence across the Middle East.
Despite public calls for de-escalation, the Biden administration has consistently backed Israel politically and militarily, supplying a steady stream of bombs to support its military actions. Washington has seemingly approved every aggressive move made by Israel this year, including the targeted killings of Hamas leaders in Beirut and Tehran, as well as the assassination of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah.
As the conflict in Gaza continues to intensify, resulting in nearly 42,000 fatalities, Israel is simultaneously conducting airstrikes in Beirut and preparing for potential actions against Iran. This situation has raised questions about the growing disconnect between U.S. rhetoric and actual policy. Is the Biden administration merely failing to rein in Israel, as some liberal commentators suggest, or is it actively responsible for the escalation, leveraging the chaos to push a hawkish agenda against Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah?
Analysts argue that the U.S., through its military and diplomatic support for Israel, plays a pivotal role in perpetuating the violence in the region, despite its public statements calling for restraint. Evidence increasingly suggests that the Biden administration is closely aligned with Israel, rather than being a passive ally.
Shifting Support: From Ceasefire to Military Endorsement
After months of advocating for a ceasefire in Gaza, the Biden administration has redirected its focus towards supporting Israel’s military operations in Lebanon. In a recent statement, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin expressed support for Israel’s ground campaign in southern Lebanon, which carries the risk of escalating into a full-scale invasion. “I made it clear that the United States supports Israel’s right to defend itself,” he asserted following a call with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.
The Biden administration’s stance has evolved amid ongoing violence. Following an assassination campaign against Hezbollah’s military leaders, Israel initiated extensive bombing raids across Lebanon, displacing over a million people and destroying civilian infrastructure. These actions have led to a significant humanitarian crisis, further complicating the situation.
Despite prior assurances of working toward a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, the U.S. response has shifted. The administration proposed a 21-day ceasefire on September 25, aiming to quell the escalating violence. However, two days later, the assassination of Nasrallah by Israel—an act approved by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from the United Nations General Assembly in New York—rendered any hopes for an imminent ceasefire moot. The White House later described the attack as a “measure of justice.”
For months, the Biden administration resisted calls for a ceasefire amid growing humanitarian concerns, maintaining that Israel had a right to retaliate against Hamas. Recent investigations by ProPublica and Reuters revealed that the Biden administration ignored internal warnings about potential Israeli war crimes in Gaza while continuing arms transfers to Israel.
As the situation in the Middle East unfolds, the Biden administration’s approach is increasingly scrutinized, revealing a complex interplay between diplomatic rhetoric and military support that may shape the region’s future.
Source :Swifteradio.com
