Zambia’s Presidential Witchcraft Trial Sparks Debate Over Colonial-Era Laws and Traditional Beliefs

Zambia’s Presidential Witchcraft Trial Sparks Debate Over Colonial-Era Laws and Traditional Beliefs

In a case that has captivated Zambia, two men are on trial for allegedly using witchcraft in an attempt to harm President Hakainde Hichilema. This high-profile trial has ignited discussions about the relevance of colonial-era legislation and the enduring influence of traditional beliefs in modern Zambian society.

The Allegations

The accused, Jasten Mabulesse Candunde and Leonard Phiri, were arrested in December 2024 in Lusaka after a hotel cleaner reported unusual noises emanating from their room. Upon investigation, authorities discovered a live chameleon and various mystical items, leading to charges of practicing witchcraft, possession of charms, and animal cruelty. The prosecution alleges that the men were hired by Nelson Banda, brother of fugitive former lawmaker Emmanuel Banda, to cast a deadly curse on President Hichilema. The suspects reportedly confessed to agreeing to a payment of $7,400 for their services.

Colonial-Era Legislation Under Scrutiny

This trial has brought renewed attention to Zambia’s Witchcraft Act, a law enacted in 1914 during British colonial rule. Critics argue that the legislation fails to acknowledge the complexities of African traditional practices. Gankhanani Moyo, a cultural heritage lecturer at the University of Zambia, expressed disdain for the outdated law, stating that it attempts to outlaw practices it does not understand.

Cultural Context and Public Perception

Despite Zambia’s official Christian affiliation, belief in witchcraft remains pervasive. A 2018 study by the Zambia Law Development Commission revealed that 79% of Zambians believe in the existence of witchcraft. This widespread belief underscores the tension between modern legal frameworks and traditional cultural practices. Journalist Enoch Ngoma noted that many Zambians take witchcraft seriously, which contributes to the intense public interest in the trial.

Political Intrigue and Media Coverage

The case is further complicated by its political undertones. Some observers interpret the trial as a political maneuver by President Hichilema, who faces re-election next year. The judiciary initially planned to broadcast the trial live but reversed the decision, citing concerns from stakeholders, including the influential Council of Churches. This move has sparked debates about transparency and the role of media in such sensitive cases.

Broader Implications

The trial highlights the challenges of reconciling colonial-era laws with contemporary cultural beliefs. It raises critical questions about the legitimacy and applicability of laws that may not align with the lived experiences and traditions of the populace. As Zambia continues to navigate its post-colonial identity, this case serves as a focal point for discussions on legal reform, cultural preservation, and the complex interplay between tradition and modernity.

Source : Swifteradio.com